首页> 外文OA文献 >Energy transfers and spectral eddy viscosity in large-eddy simulations of homogeneous isotropic turbulence: Comparison of dynamic Smagorinsky and multiscale models over a range of discretizations
【2h】

Energy transfers and spectral eddy viscosity in large-eddy simulations of homogeneous isotropic turbulence: Comparison of dynamic Smagorinsky and multiscale models over a range of discretizations

机译:均质各向同性湍流大涡模拟中的能量传递和频谱涡粘度:在离散化范围内动态Smagorinsky模型和多尺度模型的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Energy transfers within large-eddy simulation (LES) and direct numerical simulation (DNS) grids are studied. The spectral eddy viscosity for conventional dynamic Smagorinsky and variational multiscale LES methods are compared with DNS results. Both models underestimate the DNS results for a very coarse LES, but the dynamic Smagorinsky model is significantly better. For moderately to well-refined LES, the dynamic Smagorinsky model overestimates the spectral eddy viscosity at low wave numbers. The multiscale model is in good agreement with DNS for these cases. The convergence of the multiscale model to the DNS with grid refinement is more rapid than for the dynamic Smagorinsky model.
机译:研究了大涡模拟(LES)和直接数值模拟(DNS)网格内的能量传递。将常规动态Smagorinsky方法和变分多尺度LES方法的光谱涡流粘度与DNS结果进行比较。两种模型都低估了非常粗糙的LES的DNS结果,但动态Smagorinsky模型要好得多。对于中度到精细的LES,动态Smagorinsky模型会高估低波数时的光谱涡流粘度。在这些情况下,多尺度模型与DNS完全一致。与动态Smagorinsky模型相比,采用网格细化的多尺度模型到DNS的收敛更快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号